Environment matters : the impact of urea and macromolecular crowding on proteins

dc.contributor
Universitat de Barcelona. Facultat de Biologia
dc.contributor.author
Candotti, Michela
dc.date.accessioned
2017-06-13T09:33:17Z
dc.date.available
2017-06-13T09:33:17Z
dc.date.issued
2016-12-09
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/10803/403839
dc.description.abstract
This work aims to analytically understand the impact of two diametric opposite environments on protein structure and dynamics and compared them to the most common solvent on earth: water. The first environment is a popular denaturing solution (urea 8M), which has served for years in protein-science laboratories to investigate protein stability; still many open questions regarding its mechanism of action remained unclear. The second environment instead moves towards a more physiological representation of proteins. The cell interior, in fact, is a crowded solution highly populated prevalently by proteins, but studies on protein structure and dynamics have lead so far to confusing or even opposite observations. The lack of a consensus view in both phenomena possibly derives from the bias of the system under study. This work is an attempt of a comparative study using the most general systems: a diverse spectrum of proteins folds, different stages along the reaction path (early stages or end-point) and/or different protein force-fields. Our main objective was to derive common pattern and general rules valid at proteome level, focusing on three major aspects of proteins: the structure, the dynamic and the interactions with the solvent molecules. Molecular dynamics simulation appeared then as the most suitable tool because of its ability to i) analyze proteins at broad range of resolutions; ii) access the direct time-resolved dynamic of the system and iii) dissect the specific interactions that arise in the new settings. Specifically, the case of urea-induced unfolding needs a system for which is possible to clearly identify folded and unfolded state – globular proteins are then the most suitable ones. We extracted general rules on the folded/unfolded transition by studying independently the two end-points of folded/unfolded reaction. We simulated the urea-induced unfolded state of a model protein, ubiquitin to understand the energetics stabilizing unfolded structures in urea. We found that the unfolded ubiquitin in 8M urea is fully extend and flexible and capturing efficiently urea molecules to the first solvation shell. Dispersion, rather than electrostatic, appear the main energetic contribution to explain the stabilization of the unfolded state. We then simulated the early stages of urea-induced unfolding on a large dataset of folded proteins, which represent the major folds of globular proteins, aiming also to investigate the kinetic role of urea in triggering the protein unfolding. We found that partially unfolded proteins expose the apolar residues buried in the protein interior, mainly via cavitation. Similar to the unfolded state, it is the dispersion interactions that drive urea accumulation in the solvation shell but here urea molecules take advantage of microscopic unfolding events to penetrate the protein interior. Macromolecular crowding instead is a phenomenon that universally affects all the proteins. We simulated a system that included as crowding agents proteins with different conformational landscapes (a globular protein, an intrinsically disordered proteins and a molten globule) arranged to reach cell-like concentrations. We conclude that the universal effect of crowding, valid for all the proteins types, is exerted via the aspecific interactions and favors open and moderately extended conformations with higher secondary structure content. This phenomenon counterbalances the volume-exclusion, which prevails at higher crowding concentrations. The impact of crowding is proportional to the degree of disorder of the protein and for folded protein crowding favors structural rearrangements while unfolded structures experience a stronger stabilization and a higher secondary structures content. The synthetic crowder PEG doesn’t reproduce any of these effects, arising concerns about its employment in study cell-like environments.
en_US
dc.format.extent
188 p.
en_US
dc.format.mimetype
application/pdf
dc.language.iso
eng
en_US
dc.publisher
Universitat de Barcelona
dc.rights.license
L'accés als continguts d'aquesta tesi queda condicionat a l'acceptació de les condicions d'ús establertes per la següent llicència Creative Commons: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.rights.uri
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
*
dc.source
TDX (Tesis Doctorals en Xarxa)
dc.subject
Urea
en_US
dc.subject
Proteïnes
en_US
dc.subject
Proteínas
en_US
dc.subject
Proteins
en_US
dc.subject
Macromolècules
en_US
dc.subject
Macromoléculas
en_US
dc.subject
Macromolecules
en_US
dc.subject.other
Ciències Experimentals i Matemàtiques
en_US
dc.title
Environment matters : the impact of urea and macromolecular crowding on proteins
en_US
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.subject.udc
577
en_US
dc.contributor.director
Orozco López, Modesto
dc.embargo.terms
cap
en_US
dc.rights.accessLevel
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess


Documents

MICHELA CANDOTTI_PhD_THESIS.pdf

33.51Mb PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)